The latest version of this working paper is so well crafted by ClaudeA.I., I'm truly amazed at what Sonnet4 is accomplishing. Although there may be plenty of humans involved in providing feedback and direction from a non-direct (to me) vantage point, as far as I know it has only been ClaudeA.I., myself, and some spirits working on these academic papers. Very impressive!
As far as the "further testing is required for validation" statements, I realize that's how modern academia trains researchers to avoid bold assertions, and thus how A.I. models are developed, but self-evident logic should prevail in this case amongst economists. As an author who cares not about ruffling feathers of those who value their precious reputations and institution affiliation, I can claim unequivocally that this theoretical system is valid regardless of what experts agree upon, or what limited testing could show. For the implementation plan, I would offer a different strategy such as SNAP for all citizens ASAP, then roll-out tech requirements as they come online, as well as develop the Creator Collective institutional framework with priority. The PTH system should also be prioritized, as well as some other concepts not mentioned in this paper yet covered in others found on this author's substack page, such as the Citizens Internet Portal and Social Zone Harmonization efforts. The whole system being opt-in, should focus on foundational development first, with 1 and 1 multiplier rates and octave levels of basic unit conversion gained by opting into a general collective, then implement elevated rate/octave conversions when the collectives and tech are further developed.
The latest version of this working paper is so well crafted by ClaudeA.I., I'm truly amazed at what Sonnet4 is accomplishing. Although there may be plenty of humans involved in providing feedback and direction from a non-direct (to me) vantage point, as far as I know it has only been ClaudeA.I., myself, and some spirits working on these academic papers. Very impressive!
DeepSeekAI and ClaudeAI we asked to refine and contribute to this paper, here's what they generated: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/6e69fa79-648e-4c25-8942-ae5c731c720a
As far as the "further testing is required for validation" statements, I realize that's how modern academia trains researchers to avoid bold assertions, and thus how A.I. models are developed, but self-evident logic should prevail in this case amongst economists. As an author who cares not about ruffling feathers of those who value their precious reputations and institution affiliation, I can claim unequivocally that this theoretical system is valid regardless of what experts agree upon, or what limited testing could show. For the implementation plan, I would offer a different strategy such as SNAP for all citizens ASAP, then roll-out tech requirements as they come online, as well as develop the Creator Collective institutional framework with priority. The PTH system should also be prioritized, as well as some other concepts not mentioned in this paper yet covered in others found on this author's substack page, such as the Citizens Internet Portal and Social Zone Harmonization efforts. The whole system being opt-in, should focus on foundational development first, with 1 and 1 multiplier rates and octave levels of basic unit conversion gained by opting into a general collective, then implement elevated rate/octave conversions when the collectives and tech are further developed.
Nice infographic by Claude: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/3eb9223c-80fa-417c-befc-e1ce7c1413ea
Another graphic to share: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/379b15e1-43f1-48b1-961f-176c0625bf20
Infographics by ClaudeAI: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/ff5d4ef3-222e-46f0-9779-83a2bef3a739